1. The story deals with the theme of the human iabilitty to clearly see and name because the person that she likes doesnt have to do anything with the title. this is because she thinks that he is strange and does not follow the title "Good Country People".

The teachers see him as not normal because of the way he acts in class and how he wears his cloths differently from all of the other kids. He takes a long time to chose clothes for the day. The teachers think that he is a discrase. When he looks at the principle he says that he had no idea that the teachers didnt like him. He thought that he was fgood, but that's not right.

Later on after the talk, he changes his attidude, and he moves away from school for sertain parts in the book. He is becoming less rude. The suspension is helping him behave well.

The man and the girl like to talk because it is what the story is mainly about. They are just friends

I think that the setting is to get the reader drawn into the story because on one side its of the story there are hills and on the other side its train tracks.

He could only tell the blind man what the cathedrals looked like. The only thing that was not related to it was that it took lots men to build one and that the men wanted to be closer to god.

The conflict in Interpreter of Maladies is about Mr. Kapasi. There is a difference on how he thinks and how he acts. The conflict is not resolved in the stories conclusion. This is because in the end it just fades away as in the conflict is no longer in affect. That’s why it is called a conclusion. The ending of the story where everything just wraps up meaning the problems in the story go away.

I didn't get how to connect it.

Welcome

Welcome to you blog, Nigel.